<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTML or XHTML?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/</link>
	<description>Web development and Internet trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Teandardelf</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-623882</link>
		<dc:creator>Teandardelf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-623882</guid>
		<description>Hi guys,

I know this might be a bit off topic but seeing that a bunch of you own websites, where would the best place be to host.  Someone recommended I use Blue Host for $6.95 a month which seems like a great deal.  Anyone here on robertnyman.com using them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,</p>
<p>I know this might be a bit off topic but seeing that a bunch of you own websites, where would the best place be to host.  Someone recommended I use Blue Host for $6.95 a month which seems like a great deal.  Anyone here on robertnyman.com using them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The answers to the &#8220;Looking for a good interface developer?&#8221; questions - Robert's talk</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-603597</link>
		<dc:creator>The answers to the &#8220;Looking for a good interface developer?&#8221; questions - Robert's talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-603597</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s mostly about rendering mode, and in my mind you should always go for strict. Read more at Transitional vs. Strict Markup by RJ, and I also scratch the surface in my post HTML or XHTML?. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s mostly about rendering mode, and in my mind you should always go for strict. Read more at Transitional vs. Strict Markup by RJ, and I also scratch the surface in my post HTML or XHTML?. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doliaku! :::: &#187; ¿HTML o XHTML?</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-596935</link>
		<dc:creator>Doliaku! :::: &#187; ¿HTML o XHTML?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-596935</guid>
		<description>[...] Versi&#243;n original del art&#237;culo por Robert Nyman (autorizado por &#233;l mismo v&#237;a e-mail) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Versi&oacute;n original del art&iacute;culo por Robert Nyman (autorizado por &eacute;l mismo v&iacute;a e-mail) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auf Wiedersehen, XHTML - Willkommen zurÃ¼ck, HTML &#171; hasematzel.de: Ein Blog von Oliver Schwarz</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-575172</link>
		<dc:creator>Auf Wiedersehen, XHTML - Willkommen zurÃ¼ck, HTML &#171; hasematzel.de: Ein Blog von Oliver Schwarz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-575172</guid>
		<description>[...] Robert Nyman machte zwischenzeitlich mal einen kurzen Ausbruchsversuch, bekam dafÃ¼r auch viele, viele, kleine Jehova-Steinchen an den Kopf. Doch mittlerweile ist der Hype ziemlich abgeklungen und man hÃ¶rt derweil schon eine Menge von HTML5. Jeremy Keith macht UXLondon in HTML5. Ein grossartiges Gebilde, das mehr ist als ein Showcase. Gerade heute ging FullFrontal ebenfalls mit HTML5-Doctype online. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Robert Nyman machte zwischenzeitlich mal einen kurzen Ausbruchsversuch, bekam dafÃ¼r auch viele, viele, kleine Jehova-Steinchen an den Kopf. Doch mittlerweile ist der Hype ziemlich abgeklungen und man hÃ¶rt derweil schon eine Menge von HTML5. Jeremy Keith macht UXLondon in HTML5. Ein grossartiges Gebilde, das mehr ist als ein Showcase. Gerade heute ging FullFrontal ebenfalls mit HTML5-Doctype online. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rules to Create a efficient Web page &#171; Pilar&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-483626</link>
		<dc:creator>Rules to Create a efficient Web page &#171; Pilar&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-483626</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/" rel="nofollow">http://www.robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HTML or XHTML &#171; Empasize on Learning</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-483619</link>
		<dc:creator>HTML or XHTML &#171; Empasize on Learning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-483619</guid>
		<description>[...] beingÂ very little understandÂ what is HTML, XHTML is a blank canvas for me.Â Â There is blog by Robert Nyman offers good articles regarding this subject which sugested that choosing HTML or XHTML is depending [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] beingÂ very little understandÂ what is HTML, XHTML is a blank canvas for me.Â Â There is blog by Robert Nyman offers good articles regarding this subject which sugested that choosing HTML or XHTML is depending [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web standards developer</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-467032</link>
		<dc:creator>web standards developer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-467032</guid>
		<description>Hi Robert, last time i visited here its was the old site. Same interest of web standards and XHTML strict only i guess. I have been practising XHTML strict since i find it so easy to already prepare the site with functionaloty to PHP programmers and it actually saves time and development. The CSS makes everything so easy to globally change and edit funtions and layout issues.

I love this XHTML technology and i dont believe that HTML5 will be a step up but the XHTML 2 might have even better but more cut tags as i have seen in the examples...

Time till show if XHTML or HTML will be the flagship in the web development future. As i understand its only some 10% or us front-end developers that actually practice web standards with validation options. I think this is the future and its very important also to make websites for more different platform layouts and browsers...

Cheerio...

Michael Persson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert, last time i visited here its was the old site. Same interest of web standards and XHTML strict only i guess. I have been practising XHTML strict since i find it so easy to already prepare the site with functionaloty to PHP programmers and it actually saves time and development. The CSS makes everything so easy to globally change and edit funtions and layout issues.</p>
<p>I love this XHTML technology and i dont believe that HTML5 will be a step up but the XHTML 2 might have even better but more cut tags as i have seen in the examples&#8230;</p>
<p>Time till show if XHTML or HTML will be the flagship in the web development future. As i understand its only some 10% or us front-end developers that actually practice web standards with validation options. I think this is the future and its very important also to make websites for more different platform layouts and browsers&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheerio&#8230;</p>
<p>Michael Persson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOCTYPE.. (X)HTML, Strict or Transitional? :: Winston{YW}</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-394231</link>
		<dc:creator>DOCTYPE.. (X)HTML, Strict or Transitional? :: Winston{YW}</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-394231</guid>
		<description>[...] HTML or XHTML [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] HTML or XHTML [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hosting Provider</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-315821</link>
		<dc:creator>Hosting Provider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-315821</guid>
		<description>I think XHTML will strict you to code the website more neat and tidy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think XHTML will strict you to code the website more neat and tidy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Hosting Finder</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-315806</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Hosting Finder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-315806</guid>
		<description>I would prefer Html 4.0 for small websites and XHTML for more adavnced websites, Though there are still a large number of popular websites on the web using HTML 4.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would prefer Html 4.0 for small websites and XHTML for more adavnced websites, Though there are still a large number of popular websites on the web using HTML 4.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiran</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-282947</link>
		<dc:creator>kiran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 10:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-282947</guid>
		<description>I dont know weather there is any solution for my problem!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know weather there is any solution for my problem!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiran</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-279440</link>
		<dc:creator>kiran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-279440</guid>
		<description>I have a problem migrating ASP.NET1.1 code to ASP.NET2.0.
i have just copied all the .aspx files to 2.0 and have to remove DOCTYPE in 2.0 other wise it wont support 1.1 code.
Now the problem is some of the 2.0 controls are not functioning properly as the required DOCTYPE is not present.
what to do for making my web app compatible to both 1.1 and 2.0 controls</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a problem migrating ASP.NET1.1 code to ASP.NET2.0.<br />
i have just copied all the .aspx files to 2.0 and have to remove DOCTYPE in 2.0 other wise it wont support 1.1 code.<br />
Now the problem is some of the 2.0 controls are not functioning properly as the required DOCTYPE is not present.<br />
what to do for making my web app compatible to both 1.1 and 2.0 controls</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiran</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-279437</link>
		<dc:creator>kiran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-279437</guid>
		<description>I have a problem  migrating ASP.NET1.1 code to ASP.NET2.0. 
i have just copied all the .aspx files to 2.0 and have to remove the  in 2.0 other wise it wont support 1.1 code.
Now the problem is some of the 2.0 controls are not functioning properly as the required DOCTYPE is not present. 
what to do for making my web app compatible to both 1.1 and 2.0 controls</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a problem  migrating ASP.NET1.1 code to ASP.NET2.0.<br />
i have just copied all the .aspx files to 2.0 and have to remove the  in 2.0 other wise it wont support 1.1 code.<br />
Now the problem is some of the 2.0 controls are not functioning properly as the required DOCTYPE is not present.<br />
what to do for making my web app compatible to both 1.1 and 2.0 controls</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-267347</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-267347</guid>
		<description>I also still don&#039;t know why you would use html as opposed to xhtml, the features are relatively the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also still don&#8217;t know why you would use html as opposed to xhtml, the features are relatively the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Nyman</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-154853</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Nyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-154853</guid>
		<description>Nathalie,

It depends on that what kind of web site it is for, but I would suggest that you would go with a strict Dotype. Also, I&#039;d strongly recommend you to handcode and not use a WYSIWYG tool for building a web site, to learn the ins and outs of HTML. I&#039;d say it&#039;s essential to learn the basics and at the same time get a 100% control of the code itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathalie,</p>
<p>It depends on that what kind of web site it is for, but I would suggest that you would go with a strict Dotype. Also, I&#8217;d strongly recommend you to handcode and not use a WYSIWYG tool for building a web site, to learn the ins and outs of HTML. I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s essential to learn the basics and at the same time get a 100% control of the code itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathalie</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-154024</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 11:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-154024</guid>
		<description>Hiya,

I&#039;m making a website as part of my Personal Project for MYP (Middle Years Programme) which is part of the IBO.

I&#039;m having troubles with the compatibility in different web browsers.
I have Dreamweaver but I&#039;m not sure what to use; my options are...

HTML 4.01 Transitional
HTML 4.01 Strict
XHTML 1.0 Transitional
XHTML 1.0 Strict
XHTML 1.1
XHTML Mobile 1.0

any ideas to help me please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m making a website as part of my Personal Project for MYP (Middle Years Programme) which is part of the IBO.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having troubles with the compatibility in different web browsers.<br />
I have Dreamweaver but I&#8217;m not sure what to use; my options are&#8230;</p>
<p>HTML 4.01 Transitional<br />
HTML 4.01 Strict<br />
XHTML 1.0 Transitional<br />
XHTML 1.0 Strict<br />
XHTML 1.1<br />
XHTML Mobile 1.0</p>
<p>any ideas to help me please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeric</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-106453</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-106453</guid>
		<description>really both (XHTML HTML)are the web base today</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really both (XHTML HTML)are the web base today</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sitestone &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wordt het wat met HTML 5?</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-67694</link>
		<dc:creator>Sitestone &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wordt het wat met HTML 5?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 09:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-67694</guid>
		<description>[...] door sommigen betwijfeld. Misschien doet XHTML alleen maar kwaad? Of maakt het eigenljk niet uit of je HTML of XHTML gebruikt? Een aantal guru&#8217;s van het eerste moment heeft inmiddels de switch terug naar HTML 4 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] door sommigen betwijfeld. Misschien doet XHTML alleen maar kwaad? Of maakt het eigenljk niet uit of je HTML of XHTML gebruikt? Een aantal guru&#8217;s van het eerste moment heeft inmiddels de switch terug naar HTML 4 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Semantik vs. die Frage nach HTML oder XHTML at trilodge computin blog</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-52097</link>
		<dc:creator>Semantik vs. die Frage nach HTML oder XHTML at trilodge computin blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 19:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-52097</guid>
		<description>[...] oder Transitional? Diese Frage stellt sich mir viel eher als das st&#228;ndige HTML vs. XHTML, wie hier, hier oder auch hier. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] oder Transitional? Diese Frage stellt sich mir viel eher als das st&#228;ndige HTML vs. XHTML, wie hier, hier oder auch hier. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThinkingPHP and beyond &#187; How-to: Use Html 4.01 in CakePHP 1.2</title>
		<link>http://robertnyman.com/2005/11/02/html-or-xhtml/#comment-37692</link>
		<dc:creator>ThinkingPHP and beyond &#187; How-to: Use Html 4.01 in CakePHP 1.2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertnyman.com/?p=237#comment-37692</guid>
		<description>[...] ody would prefer the good old html over the all-so-hyped xhtml, read a little bit about it here. -- Felix GeisendÃƒÂ¶rfer aka the_undefined  			            Related Posts                 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ody would prefer the good old html over the all-so-hyped xhtml, read a little bit about it here. &#8212; Felix GeisendÃƒÂ¶rfer aka the_undefined  			            Related Posts                 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
