Comments on: New JavaScript features with native JSON support and JavaScript 1.8.1 additions http://robertnyman.com/2009/06/18/new-javascript-features-with-native-json-support-and-javascript-181-additions/ Web development and Internet trends Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:17:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Thank you for 2009 – Happy New Year! - Robert's talk http://robertnyman.com/2009/06/18/new-javascript-features-with-native-json-support-and-javascript-181-additions/#comment-615867 Thank you for 2009 – Happy New Year! - Robert's talk Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:34:26 +0000 http://robertnyman.com/?p=1360#comment-615867 [...] 18: New JavaScript features with native JSON support and JavaScript 1.8.1 additions [...] [...] 18: New JavaScript features with native JSON support and JavaScript 1.8.1 additions [...]

]]> By: My Bad Attitude » New JavaScript features with native JSON support and JavaScript 1.8.1 additions http://robertnyman.com/2009/06/18/new-javascript-features-with-native-json-support-and-javascript-181-additions/#comment-591344 My Bad Attitude » New JavaScript features with native JSON support and JavaScript 1.8.1 additions Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:04:37 +0000 http://robertnyman.com/?p=1360#comment-591344 [...] New JavaScript features with native JSON support and JavaScript 1.8.1 additions [...] [...] New JavaScript features with native JSON support and JavaScript 1.8.1 additions [...]

]]> By: Robert Nyman http://robertnyman.com/2009/06/18/new-javascript-features-with-native-json-support-and-javascript-181-additions/#comment-590458 Robert Nyman Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:12:42 +0000 http://robertnyman.com/?p=1360#comment-590458 Tino, Absolutely, it's a very valid concern - and naturally you should be able to use various character sets. At this point, though, I don't know more about it. Randy, Definitely, it's lightning-fast, which is why native implementations are generally such a good thing! And thanks for the kind words, I really appreciate it! :-) Tino,

Absolutely, it’s a very valid concern – and naturally you should be able to use various character sets. At this point, though, I don’t know more about it.

Randy,

Definitely, it’s lightning-fast, which is why native implementations are generally such a good thing!

And thanks for the kind words, I really appreciate it! :-)

]]> By: links for 2009-06-19 | burningCat http://robertnyman.com/2009/06/18/new-javascript-features-with-native-json-support-and-javascript-181-additions/#comment-590450 links for 2009-06-19 | burningCat Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:17:29 +0000 http://robertnyman.com/?p=1360#comment-590450 [...] New JavaScript features with native JSON support and JavaScript 1.8.1 additions [...] [...] New JavaScript features with native JSON support and JavaScript 1.8.1 additions [...]

]]> By: Randy Peterman http://robertnyman.com/2009/06/18/new-javascript-features-with-native-json-support-and-javascript-181-additions/#comment-590432 Randy Peterman Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:07:57 +0000 http://robertnyman.com/?p=1360#comment-590432 One thing worth noting is that at least in some cases (Firefox 3.5 for example) using the JSON.parse function is rapidly faster than eval. I did a quick bunch of tests <a href="http://design.randypeterman.com/index.php?p=43" rel="nofollow">here</a> and you can see the difference. Thanks for writing such a useful blog, including this post, I'm a new reader, but I've really enjoyed your content! Regards, Randy One thing worth noting is that at least in some cases (Firefox 3.5 for example) using the JSON.parse function is rapidly faster than eval. I did a quick bunch of tests here and you can see the difference. Thanks for writing such a useful blog, including this post, I’m a new reader, but I’ve really enjoyed your content!

Regards,
Randy

]]> By: Tino Zijdel http://robertnyman.com/2009/06/18/new-javascript-features-with-native-json-support-and-javascript-181-additions/#comment-590422 Tino Zijdel Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:53:30 +0000 http://robertnyman.com/?p=1360#comment-590422 I'm still trying to figure out what the effects are when using the native JSON functions in a non-UTF8 setting. All non-ASCII characters are converted to \uxxxx character-references regardless of whether they are valid characters in the current charset or not; that's something to be aware of. The simple argument that you always should use UTF8 simply doesn't always apply. I’m still trying to figure out what the effects are when using the native JSON functions in a non-UTF8 setting. All non-ASCII characters are converted to \uxxxx character-references regardless of whether they are valid characters in the current charset or not; that’s something to be aware of. The simple argument that you always should use UTF8 simply doesn’t always apply.

]]> By: Robert Nyman http://robertnyman.com/2009/06/18/new-javascript-features-with-native-json-support-and-javascript-181-additions/#comment-590391 Robert Nyman Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:51:35 +0000 http://robertnyman.com/?p=1360#comment-590391 Andrea, Thanks! And yes, it would be nice, although I try to keep this as independent as possible. :-) Dean, Absolutely, I'm very happy about it as well! Andrea,

Thanks! And yes, it would be nice, although I try to keep this as independent as possible. :-)

Dean,

Absolutely, I’m very happy about it as well!

]]> By: Dean Higginbotham http://robertnyman.com/2009/06/18/new-javascript-features-with-native-json-support-and-javascript-181-additions/#comment-590381 Dean Higginbotham Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:58:03 +0000 http://robertnyman.com/?p=1360#comment-590381 I'm so excited about this! Once I started using JSON, I never went back to XML (via AJAX). More JSON support is great! I’m so excited about this! Once I started using JSON, I never went back to XML (via AJAX). More JSON support is great!

]]> By: Andrea Giammarchi http://robertnyman.com/2009/06/18/new-javascript-features-with-native-json-support-and-javascript-181-additions/#comment-590371 Andrea Giammarchi Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:51:00 +0000 http://robertnyman.com/?p=1360#comment-590371 Hi Robert, nice one. Would be nice as well to see a compatibility page adding vice-versa on the top of the test case: http://vice-versa.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/build/vice-versa.min.js ;) Hi Robert, nice one. Would be nice as well to see a compatibility page adding vice-versa on the top of the test case:
http://vice-versa.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/build/vice-versa.min.js

;)

]]> By: Robert Nyman http://robertnyman.com/2009/06/18/new-javascript-features-with-native-json-support-and-javascript-181-additions/#comment-590354 Robert Nyman Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:33:04 +0000 http://robertnyman.com/?p=1360#comment-590354 Samisin, Glad you liked it! ChS, You are absolutely right! Sorry for being so sloppy - I'm just a bit tired and getting ready to celebrate midsummer. :-) Samisin,

Glad you liked it!

ChS,

You are absolutely right! Sorry for being so sloppy – I’m just a bit tired and getting ready to celebrate midsummer. :-)

]]> By: ChS http://robertnyman.com/2009/06/18/new-javascript-features-with-native-json-support-and-javascript-181-additions/#comment-590349 ChS Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:09:50 +0000 http://robertnyman.com/?p=1360#comment-590349 Isn't the comment result for someString.trim() wrong ? The result hasn't been trimmed. Isn’t the comment result for someString.trim() wrong ?

The result hasn’t been trimmed.

]]> By: Samisin http://robertnyman.com/2009/06/18/new-javascript-features-with-native-json-support-and-javascript-181-additions/#comment-590342 Samisin Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:00:03 +0000 http://robertnyman.com/?p=1360#comment-590342 Nice overview! Cheers! Nice overview! Cheers!

]]> By: Robert Nyman http://robertnyman.com/2009/06/18/new-javascript-features-with-native-json-support-and-javascript-181-additions/#comment-590335 Robert Nyman Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:08:26 +0000 http://robertnyman.com/?p=1360#comment-590335 Stijn, Thank you! It's fixed now. :-) Stijn,

Thank you! It’s fixed now. :-)

]]> By: Stijn http://robertnyman.com/2009/06/18/new-javascript-features-with-native-json-support-and-javascript-181-additions/#comment-590330 Stijn Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:36:34 +0000 http://robertnyman.com/?p=1360#comment-590330 I think you made a mistake in your example for JSON.stringify ;) I think you made a mistake in your example for JSON.stringify ;)

]]>