During this summer, I realized that Apple’s naming of versions seems a tad odd…
We were sitting around a table in the beautiful Swedish archipelago, having a drink and chatting a little. Big men talk about big guns, right? So, we were discussing different German tank models. Not being just a man, but a computer geek as well, it hit me that the name of German tanks are the same as the name of OS X versions.
Names of tanks and operating system versions
When I got back online, I did a quick search, and Internet being what it is, naturally I hadn’t been the only one thinking about it. In German armored vehicles and Apple Mac OS X all these are listed, but please allow me to present a short list:
- Mac OS X 10.0 Cheetah
- Tank: Flugabwehrkanonenpanzer Gepard (Gepard in German means Cheetah in English)
- Mac OS X 10.1 Puma
- Tank: Sd.Kfz. 234/2 “Puma”
- Mac OS X 10.2 Jaguar
- Tanks: Jaguar 1 and Jaguar 2
- Mac OS X 10.3 Panther
- Tank: Panther
- Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger
- Tanks: Tiger 1 and Tiger 2
- Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard
- Tanks: Leopard 1 and Leopard 2
- Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard
- Haven’t found the corresponding tank yet, but I’m sure it exists…
I’m really not sure where all this comes from, and it might just be coincidence – trust me, I’m not implying that Apple is some kind of Neo-Nazi movement in disguise (thinking about when especially the Tiger tank was mostly active). And sure, I can see why you would like to name something after great mighty cats.
But, what I really think, is that if you’re going to name a product line of any kind, don’t you just stop a moment to think, to contemplate:
a) Have anyone else used this naming convention?
b) Could there be any kind of negative connection?
Maybe my guess for the next iPhone to be named iPhone 3G SS isn’t so far off after all…