BUY CAREPROST NO PRESCRIPTION, Usually blog posts with the words "problem, "considered harmful" and similar are just crying foul, but I would like to bring up something I actually believe is/will become a real problem: HTML5 syntax options.
Available syntax options
In strict XHTML, online buying CAREPROST hcl, CAREPROST no prescription, we needed lowercase tag names, quoting our attributes, generic CAREPROST, CAREPROST overnight, and an attribute had to have a value (e.g.
selected="selected"), CAREPROST alternatives. CAREPROST interactions, We also needed to close all empty elements, e.g, ordering CAREPROST online. Buy cheap CAREPROST,
input, cheap CAREPROST, CAREPROST online cod,
img etc, like this:
<input type="text" />, CAREPROST forum.
But in HTML5, all this goes:
- Uppercase tag names
- Quotes are optional for attributes
- Attribute values are optional
- Closing empty elements are optional
All of these examples are valid HTML5:
<p id=abstract>Welcome to this blog post!</p>
<input type="text" />
Also, some people are under the impression that the closing of elements etc (basically, XML-formatting rules), only apply if you serve a web page as
application/xml, BUY CAREPROST NO PRESCRIPTION. CAREPROST duration, This is not true!. XML-style syntax is just as allowed in regular
text/html, CAREPROST wiki, CAREPROST schedule, and some people prefer that syntax.
The choice of the syntax
I believe the WHATWG did the probably only viable choice, australia, uk, us, usa, CAREPROST cost, and decided to allow all the general syntax variations. When it comes to XML syntax or not, CAREPROST from canada, Where can i order CAREPROST without prescription, if they had chosen just one path, it would severely hinder the adoption amongst those who wouldn't agree with it, CAREPROST from mexico. BUY CAREPROST NO PRESCRIPTION, When it comes to allowing uppercase tag names, no quoting of attributes etc, I believe it's there to accommodate to code generated by CMSs and other tools. CAREPROST brand name, And, at the end of the day, CAREPROST australia, uk, us, usa, Buy generic CAREPROST, web browsers will generate the same DOM no matter what syntax one prefers.
As you can see with all these options, online CAREPROST without a prescription, After CAREPROST, though, it is very hard to ensure that a consistent syntax is used for all HTML code, CAREPROST gel, ointment, cream, pill, spray, continuous-release, extended-release, CAREPROST pics, and we miss out on rigor and code quality. Basically, order CAREPROST from United States pharmacy, Buy CAREPROST online cod, it is very hard to make something fail validation under these rules; we end up with an "Anything goes"-scenario. And after all these years of fighting for stricter syntax, CAREPROST steet value, Buy CAREPROST from mexico, better code practices etc, this is naturally not a good evolvement, CAREPROST description.
How do we get stricter syntax?
There are a few options to try and accommodate to this problem:
- Change the spec
- We could change the specification to say that XML-syntax is only allowed for
application/xhtml+xml, and HTML-syntax, strict-style, otherwise, BUY CAREPROST NO PRESCRIPTION. CAREPROST coupon, However, as mentioned above, comprar en línea CAREPROST, comprar CAREPROST baratos, CAREPROST pharmacy, I believe in people choosing the syntax type they prefer.
- We could all try to evangelize a better syntax, just as we have done all these years, where can i buy cheapest CAREPROST online. However, I believe this will never be enough: people will evangelize for different syntaxes, and whatever web developers choose in the end will validate (even a mix of syntaxes will).
- Offering tools with different validation options
- There could be an offering of tools, and the validator itself, to have options for a stricter syntax. Therefore, rather helping developers by code auditing, than forbidding things through a specification.
I believe the last option here is the only realistic one we could choose. Also, let me point out that I do not put an equal sign between a strict validation option and XML-syntax. BUY CAREPROST NO PRESCRIPTION, For some it is, but for others it's not. Stricter for me personally means good HTML 4-style: lowercase tag names, quotes and values mandatory for attributes and closing of all non-empty elements (i.e. all elements that have en end tag). Maybe there should be more than one option in the validator.
But is this enough. Can we continue to fight for sensible and best practices syntax where tools/validator options are sufficient. Or, have just (re)opened Pandora's Box for the web.
Similar posts: SPIRIVA OVER THE COUNTER. SPIRIVA FOR SALE. BUSPAR OVER THE COUNTER. RETINA FOR SALE. STROMECTOL FOR SALE. BUY DESYREL NO PRESCRIPTION. CELEBREX FOR SALE. Buy no prescription LUMIGAN online. Is TRAMADOL addictive. DELTASONE description. Order MEDROL from United States pharmacy. ALDACTONE duration. Where can i buy DESYREL online. Doses ADVAIR work.
Trackbacks from: BUY CAREPROST NO PRESCRIPTION. BUY CAREPROST NO PRESCRIPTION. BUY CAREPROST NO PRESCRIPTION. BUY CAREPROST NO PRESCRIPTION. BUY CAREPROST NO PRESCRIPTION. BUY CAREPROST NO PRESCRIPTION. BUY CAREPROST NO PRESCRIPTION. CAREPROST street price. Where can i buy cheapest CAREPROST online. Order CAREPROST from mexican pharmacy. Cheap CAREPROST no rx. Discount CAREPROST. Online buying CAREPROST. CAREPROST price, coupon.